Category: games

These days, I am quite fascinated with the idea of studying the development of a genre, game type, or game series over the years. It just hasn’t been done much (seems we have mostly been doing the very big picture or general musings on a single game), and the payoff from studying details is often surprisingly high. (To see the world in a grain of sand.)

Via GameSetWatch, here’s Blogging Ultima, where CageBlogger has been playing his way through the Ultima series since February.

From the introduction:

Welcome to what will presumably be a long-running Ultima blog. The purpose is to blog the experience of playing the now-defunct Ultima series by Origin Systems (plus a few other names here and there) from beginning to end. I will be including all the non-remake spin-offs that I am aware of, under the theory of “If I’m gonna do it, might as well go all the way.” I am not blogging as if I am a character in the game, or giving reviews. I’m going to write about the process of playing, the annoying things, the fun things, and the assorted mental musings that arise from any long-term activity.

Details are good.

It’s hard to argue with Blizzard these days, but the announcement of StarCraft II stirs many emotions for me.

One is respect for the game design of the original game (balancing three entirely different races that well!), but the other is that I experienced my own playing as a long plateau: I would admire the game design, but feel that I just wasn’t getting any better at the game. Perhaps, this time.

I have put up a new article, “Swap Adjacent Gems to Make Sets of Three: A History of Matching Tile Games.”

Swap Adjacent Gems is an attempt at writing the history of matching tile games through the last 20 years.

This is a quite detailed article that discusses a large number of small games. It touches on a few things I consider underexplored:

• How does a game genre develop historically?
• What is special about casual games and the casual games channel?
• How do developers perceive the issue of originality in casual games?
• How does a player make sense of a new game?

Swap Adjacent Gems is slated to appear in the Artifact Journal, October 2007.

Acknowledgment: Thanks to everybody who helped me by commenting on my earlier post about matching tile history.

Main Entry: ex-core
Pronunciation: 'eks-'kor
Function: adjective

1: Gamer that is no longer a hardcore gamer.

Coined by Juan Gril on the Casual Games mailing list.

I meet a lot of these. Jobs, kids, etc. making it impossible to be a core gamer anymore.

Speaking at a How They Got Game workshop on Tuesday the 17th of April 2007 from 3pm – 4:30pm on the 4th floor of Wallenberg Hall at Stanford University.

Abstract:

In 1977, there were no “hardcore” players of video games: Every video game had to be created with the assumption that players had no understanding of video games, genres, and controllers. Thirty years later, video games are primarily designed for players with extensive knowledge of video game conventions. This is how video games gained a specialized audience, but lost the general public. In this perspective, video games have long ago become a developed “art”, created for connoisseurs, by connoisseurs with a deep understanding of the medium. Using examples, I will discuss the rise of the hardcore gamer market, and how video games are once again opening up to new players via new platforms like the Wii, and via casual games.

These workshops are open to all interested parties with a strong interest in topics surrounding new media, technology, and design. They offer the chance to hear talks by industry professionals and seasoned academics, but also offer the rare opportunity for one-on-one questions as well as collaborative work.

How They Got Game is a research project at the Stanford Humanities Lab dedicated to the historical investigation of computer games and other related interactive technologies. Its diverse membership possesses varying academic interests ranging from machinima, virtual worlds and interactive storytelling.