Continuing with the book updates, Keith Stuart of the Guardian Gamesblog lists A Casual Revolution in the Gamesblog Christmas Book Corner.
Author: Jesper
Interviews with ex-hardcore Gamers
Kotaku is running some excerpts from the interview section of A Casual Revolution. In the book I interviewed players about how their playing habits had changed over time.
One of the player types I identified was the ex-hardcore player, whose life has become conducive to playing shorter-form casual games.
The excerpt also features interviews showing how new players came to play casual games.
——————
Type 2: These are the stories of players who used to intensely play video games and now have switched to more casual video games.
Survey response from a 40-year-old female player.
Q: Have your game-playing habits changed over the years?
A: I used to only play RPGs like Guild Wars but you can start and stop casual games easier during the day.
Survey response from a 42-year-old female player.
Q: Have your game-playing habits changed over the years?
A: Started with text-only adventure games, moved toward RPG video-games & simulations, most recently I stick with time management-type casual games.
Survey response from a 30-year-old female player.
Q: Have your game-playing habits changed over the years?
A: Having a baby really changed my game playing habits. When she needs my attention the game must stop. This is why World of Warcraft has been hard to play as of late.
Apple’s App Store: The Paranoid Theory
As discussed here before, I think video games are often treated with the faulty assumption that they should somehow be the only art form in existence to only have nice unobjectionable content that offends no one.
With the seemingly arbitrary rejection policies of the iPhone App Store continuing and no end in sight, it occurs to me that there is a theory that could explain Apple’s behavior as rational, if morally dubious. While the App Store policy is obviously horrible from an end-user and developer point of view, there may be some method to the apparent madness.
Look at it from Apple’s point of view. Here is what they get from having an opaque and inconsistent policy:
- Apple avoids having to formulate a policy that works for all cultures across the globe. After all, standards for nudity, profanity and violence are completely inconsistent between the countries of the world.
- Apple thereby avoids having to defend and argue about the policy.
- The arbitrariness of the current situation has an intended chilling effect, by which developers self-censor in order to avoid having their applications blocked.
Anyway, that’s a theory that explains the seemingly arbitrary App Store policy as rational and deliberate. It’s either that, or Apple aren’t thinking clearly.
Smartphone compatible
This blog should now be specially formatted for your smartphone (assuming we still use that word) of choice: iPhone, iPod touch, Android, Opera Mini mobile, Palm Pre and BlackBerry Storm.
Let me know how it works for you.
A Casual Revolution and the Future of Video Games
If you are in New York City, please join me for the book launch and panel debate for A Casual Revolution: Reinventing Video Games and Their Players.
Thursday, December 17, 2009
6:00pm – 8:30pm
Tisch school of the Arts, room 006
721 Broadway
New York, NY
In this evening of debate, Jesper Juul (New York University Game Center) will introduce the new book, followed by a panel discussion on the rise of casual games and the future of video games. The panel consisting of Mia Consalvo (MIT, author of Cheating), Nick Fortugno (Playmatics, formerly Gamelab) and Wade Tinney (Large Animal) will discuss topics such as:
- What are casual games, and where did they come from?
- Are casual games saving video games from cultural ghettoization, or are they preventing video games from dealing with serious themes?
- Are traditional gamers right to feel threatened by casual games?
- Do game developers have an obligation to make games for everybody?
- How should video game studies deal with new game forms and different types of players?
Refreshments will be served. Hope you can make it!
[Update: The event podcast can be downloaded here.]
Three Ways of Playing
Jamin Brophy-Warren writes about New Super Mario Bros for the Wii.
And refers to some of my thoughts from A Casual Revolution, on playing to win vs. playing to keep the game interesting vs. playing to manage the social consequences:
“Jesper Juul, a video-game researcher and professor at NYU’s newly minted Game Center, argues that multiplayer games give us three things to balance. Players want to win and they want the game to be fair, but they also need to navigate whatever relationships they have outside the game – that is, if you shoot your friend in the head in Call of Duty, you’ll have to answer for that in the offline world. My brother and the jerk from E3 were solely concerned with winning. I mostly cared about the game being fair. None of us, though, sat down and talked about the third factor – what we were planning to do during our journey as in-game teammates.”
Social Network Game Genres
Farmville reached 65 million users in November, so something major is happening. Video games continue to reach a broader audience and be available in more places.
… but social games do seem to have gelled into some distinct genres. From Virtual Shackles:
Podcast Interview in the Another Castle Series
Game Design Advance has posted a podcast interview with me as part of the Another Castle series.
The interview, here, is about the state and history of video game studies as well as a dive into some of the concepts from Half-Real.
Other interviewees in the Another Castle series include Frank Lantz, Anna Anthropy, Greg Trefry and Richard Rouse III.