Actually, I say the above frequently.
But in First Person, Mark Barrett has written a response to Janet Murray’s article on cyberdrama.
Discussion at Intelligent Artifice.
Suffice to say that video game academics (all of us) get a terrible review. If you ask me, Barrett is doing some unnuanced generalizations, and he is about as wrong as he is right.
Since he seems to heavily dislike all academic video game theory ever, I wonder what kind of theory he would like? What would industry- (or Barrett-) friendly theory look like?