<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Gamestudies 11/03 is out	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.jesperjuul.net/ludologist/2012/01/02/gamestudies-11-03/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.jesperjuul.net/ludologist/2012/01/02/gamestudies-11-03/</link>
	<description>My name is Jesper Juul, and I am a Ludologist [researcher of the design, meaning, culture, and politics of games]. This is my blog on game research and other important things.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark N.		</title>
		<link>https://www.jesperjuul.net/ludologist/2012/01/02/gamestudies-11-03/comment-page-1/#comment-56959</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark N.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesperjuul.net/ludologist/?p=1411#comment-56959</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Perhaps predictably, the Sicart paper seems to have drawn the most online commentary: Daniel Joseph from &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://dropouthangoutspaceout.tumblr.com/post/15131475254/against-a-particularly-reductive-reading-of&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a political-economy perspective&lt;/a&gt; mostly disagrees; I from &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.kmjn.org/notes/sicart_against_proceduralism.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a &quot;really&quot; proceduralist perspective&lt;/a&gt; mostly disagree but propose rephrased points of agreement; and Charles J. Pratt from &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://gamedesignadvance.com/?p=2409&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a play-oriented perspective&lt;/a&gt; mostly agrees with Sicart. (Bogost also replies briefly in the comments section of Pratt&#039;s article.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps predictably, the Sicart paper seems to have drawn the most online commentary: Daniel Joseph from <a HREF="http://dropouthangoutspaceout.tumblr.com/post/15131475254/against-a-particularly-reductive-reading-of" rel="nofollow">a political-economy perspective</a> mostly disagrees; I from <a HREF="http://www.kmjn.org/notes/sicart_against_proceduralism.html" rel="nofollow">a &#8220;really&#8221; proceduralist perspective</a> mostly disagree but propose rephrased points of agreement; and Charles J. Pratt from <a HREF="http://gamedesignadvance.com/?p=2409" rel="nofollow">a play-oriented perspective</a> mostly agrees with Sicart. (Bogost also replies briefly in the comments section of Pratt&#8217;s article.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
