<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Passage in 10 seconds. Now, THIS is art!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.jesperjuul.net/ludologist/2010/02/28/passage-in-10-seconds-now-this-is-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.jesperjuul.net/ludologist/2010/02/28/passage-in-10-seconds-now-this-is-art/</link>
	<description>My name is Jesper Juul, and I am a Ludologist [researcher of the design, meaning, culture, and politics of games]. This is my blog on game research and other important things.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:17:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Zhou Xuanming		</title>
		<link>https://www.jesperjuul.net/ludologist/2010/02/28/passage-in-10-seconds-now-this-is-art/comment-page-1/#comment-55475</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhou Xuanming]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesperjuul.net/ludologist/?p=938#comment-55475</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Haha!  That was certainly entertaining. :)

Are games art?  There are many arguments to that, but my personal opinion is that good art leaves interesting questions in the audience&#039;s head long after it is over.  Art in this case is very much a conceptual idea as opposed to what Marcel Duchamp calls Retinal Art (aesthetics, style, composition, etc).

In this sense, I believe Raitendo&#039;s little spoof of Passage does indeed qualify as art.  The way I read it, it questions whether the original was an overhyped representation of aging, by claiming that he has managed to represent it just as effectively in just 10 seconds.  No right/wrong answer there, which is what makes it good art in my eyes. :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha!  That was certainly entertaining. :)</p>
<p>Are games art?  There are many arguments to that, but my personal opinion is that good art leaves interesting questions in the audience&#8217;s head long after it is over.  Art in this case is very much a conceptual idea as opposed to what Marcel Duchamp calls Retinal Art (aesthetics, style, composition, etc).</p>
<p>In this sense, I believe Raitendo&#8217;s little spoof of Passage does indeed qualify as art.  The way I read it, it questions whether the original was an overhyped representation of aging, by claiming that he has managed to represent it just as effectively in just 10 seconds.  No right/wrong answer there, which is what makes it good art in my eyes. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
