<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Checkers Solved: It&#8217;s a Draw	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.jesperjuul.net/ludologist/2007/07/20/checkers-solved-its-a-draw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.jesperjuul.net/ludologist/2007/07/20/checkers-solved-its-a-draw/</link>
	<description>My name is Jesper Juul, and I am a Ludologist [researcher of the design, meaning, culture, and politics of games]. This is my blog on game research and other important things.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 20:18:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: John Vechey		</title>
		<link>https://www.jesperjuul.net/ludologist/2007/07/20/checkers-solved-its-a-draw/comment-page-1/#comment-48071</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Vechey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 20:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesperjuul.net/ludologist/?p=350#comment-48071</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I believe that it&#039;s undetermined whether or not white or black have an advantage in Chess.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that it&#8217;s undetermined whether or not white or black have an advantage in Chess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: nate_combs		</title>
		<link>https://www.jesperjuul.net/ludologist/2007/07/20/checkers-solved-its-a-draw/comment-page-1/#comment-47295</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nate_combs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesperjuul.net/ludologist/?p=350#comment-47295</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[J&#062;
(Speculating: The advantage for white in current chess could be a reflection of the opening player being allowed to select his/her favorite part of the chess game?)

Are you asking whether initiative translates into better options or whether initiative means better ability to control which options get exercised?   I would think a combination of both.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J&gt;<br />
(Speculating: The advantage for white in current chess could be a reflection of the opening player being allowed to select his/her favorite part of the chess game?)</p>
<p>Are you asking whether initiative translates into better options or whether initiative means better ability to control which options get exercised?   I would think a combination of both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jesper		</title>
		<link>https://www.jesperjuul.net/ludologist/2007/07/20/checkers-solved-its-a-draw/comment-page-1/#comment-47161</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 21:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesperjuul.net/ludologist/?p=350#comment-47161</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Does anybody know what the current hypotheses are about chess if both players play perfectly? Is it a draw? Does white win?

(Speculating: The advantage for white in current chess could be a reflection of the opening player being allowed to select his/her favorite part of the chess game?)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody know what the current hypotheses are about chess if both players play perfectly? Is it a draw? Does white win?</p>
<p>(Speculating: The advantage for white in current chess could be a reflection of the opening player being allowed to select his/her favorite part of the chess game?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: nate_combs		</title>
		<link>https://www.jesperjuul.net/ludologist/2007/07/20/checkers-solved-its-a-draw/comment-page-1/#comment-47160</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nate_combs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 21:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesperjuul.net/ludologist/?p=350#comment-47160</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#062;To be fair, I thinks this can be said about most deterministic symmetric games of perfect information where draws are possible, only with different degrees of ?smarter.?

This is why I think to get the draw you should have to roll a saving throw.  Shakes things up a bit  ;-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;To be fair, I thinks this can be said about most deterministic symmetric games of perfect information where draws are possible, only with different degrees of ?smarter.?</p>
<p>This is why I think to get the draw you should have to roll a saving throw.  Shakes things up a bit  ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Said Kassem Hamideh		</title>
		<link>https://www.jesperjuul.net/ludologist/2007/07/20/checkers-solved-its-a-draw/comment-page-1/#comment-47150</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Said Kassem Hamideh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 13:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesperjuul.net/ludologist/?p=350#comment-47150</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[laughing out loud. (chess player)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>laughing out loud. (chess player)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jesper		</title>
		<link>https://www.jesperjuul.net/ludologist/2007/07/20/checkers-solved-its-a-draw/comment-page-1/#comment-47053</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesperjuul.net/ludologist/?p=350#comment-47053</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You could say that, but it&#039;s not as catchy.

Good point.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could say that, but it&#8217;s not as catchy.</p>
<p>Good point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zach Kamsler		</title>
		<link>https://www.jesperjuul.net/ludologist/2007/07/20/checkers-solved-its-a-draw/comment-page-1/#comment-47049</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Kamsler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesperjuul.net/ludologist/?p=350#comment-47049</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;If we were only a little smarter, Checkers would be just as boring as Tic Tac Toe.&quot;

To be fair, I thinks this can be said about most deterministic symmetric games of perfect information where draws are possible, only with different degrees of &#039;smarter.&#039;

Solving checkers is undeniably impressive, though.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If we were only a little smarter, Checkers would be just as boring as Tic Tac Toe.&#8221;</p>
<p>To be fair, I thinks this can be said about most deterministic symmetric games of perfect information where draws are possible, only with different degrees of &#8216;smarter.&#8217;</p>
<p>Solving checkers is undeniably impressive, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
